article thumbnail

In contrast: 14-inch MacBook Professional vs 2022 Razer Blade 14

Posted on




AppleInsider is supported by its viewers and should earn fee as an Amazon Affiliate and affiliate associate on qualifying purchases. These affiliate partnerships don’t affect our editorial content material.

The Razer Blade 14 has been up to date for 2022 to make it extra highly effective, but it surely has to combat with the 14-inch MacBook Professional as a creator’s alternative pocket book. This is how the 2 laptops examine.

Of all the gaming manufacturers in the marketplace, it is debatable that Razer is probably the most Apple-like. It has cultivated a cool model, a particular type, and spectacular {hardware} to match.

Out of the whole assortment of merchandise, the Blade pocket book vary might be the closest to an Apple-style product. They’re gaming notebooks that try to offer appreciable efficiency to customers, whereas providing a MacBook Professional-style skinny design and portability as an alternative of a hefty pocket book that swamps a desk.

The similarities had been on show in 2021 after Apple recognized the Razer Blade 15 Superior as a gaming pocket book used to match the M1 Professional’s graphical efficiency. A more in-depth examination on the time confirmed simply how far Razer has progressed to make one thing so Apple-like whereas nonetheless decidedly being a gaming equipment.

With the 2022 replace of the Razer Blade 14, it is apt to pitch it in opposition to Apple’s 14-inch MacBook Professional, a pocket book with a really comparable type issue.

14-inch MacBook Professional versus 2022 Razer Blade 14 – Specs

Specs 14-inch MacBook Professional Razer Blade 14
Show Measurement (inches) 14.2 14
Max Decision and Refresh Price 3024 x 1964 120Hz 2560 x 1440 165Hz,
1920 x 1080 144Hz
Pixel Density 254ppi 209ppi,
157ppi
Show Backlighting Mini LED LCD
Show Know-how Extensive Shade (P3),
True Tone,
ProMotion
As much as 100% DCI-P3,
Individually manufacturing unit calibrated,
FreeSync
Processors M1 Professional with 8-core CPU
M1 Professional with 10-core CPU
M1 Max with 10-core CPU
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX,
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Reminiscence 16GB Unified Reminiscence (M1 Professional)
32GB Unified Reminiscence (M1 Professional, M1 Max)
64GB Unified Reminiscence (M1 Max)
16GB DDR5-4800MHz,
16GB DDR4-3200MHz
Graphics 14-core GPU (M1 Professional)
16-core GPU (M1 Professional)
24-core GPU (M1 Max)
32-core GPU (M1 Max)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 6GB GDDR6,
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 8GB GDDR6
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 TI 8GB GDDR6,
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 8GB GDDR6
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 16GB GDDR6
Working System macOS Monterey Home windows 11 House,
Home windows 10 House with improve to 11
Storage 512GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB 1TB SSD
Biometrics Contact ID Home windows Hi there
Trackpad Power Contact Precision Glass Touchpad
Keyboard Backlit with ambient gentle sensor Per-key RGB Razer Chroma N-Key rollover
Dimensions (inches) 0.61 x 12.31 x 8.71 0.66 x 12.59 x 8.66
Weight (kilos) 3.5 3.92
Battery Life 70WHr lithium-polymer, 17 hours 61.6WHr lithium-ion polymer, 11 hours
Ports SDXC card slot,
HDMI,
MagSafe 3,
3 USB-4/Thunderbolt ports,
Headphone jack
HDMI 2.1,
2 USB 3.2 Sort-A
2 USB 3.2 Gen 2 Sort-C
Headphone Jack
Webcam 1080p FaceTime HD 1080p Home windows Hi there IR HD
Audio system Excessive constancy six-speaker sound with huge stereo, spatial audio Stereo audio system with THX Spatial Audio
Microphones 3 with directional beamforming Array microphone
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 6 Qualcomm Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.0 5.3
Charger 67W USB-C (M1 Professional with 8-core CPU)
96W USB-C (M1 Professional with 10-core CPU, or M1 Max)
230W Energy Adapter
Shade Choices Silver, House Grey Anodized Black
Worth From $1,999 From $1,999.99

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: Design and Dimensions

At first blush, it is easy to inform the 2 notebooks aside. One is matte silver in shade with an Apple emblem on the again, whereas the opposite’s anodized black with the intense inexperienced Razer emblem.

There’s additionally a good similarity in aesthetic, with Razer going for flat, clear traces and a slab-like look.

Ignoring the instantly superficial, you then see that there are a number of similarities throughout the 2 traces. For a begin, the 2 fashions are fairly shut in measurement.

Apple’s 14-inch MacBook Professional has a footprint of 12.31 inches by 8.71 inches, whereas the Blade 14 is 12.59 inches by 8.66, making it marginally longer however not as deep. For thickness, the Razer’s bigger at 0.66 inches versus the MacBook Professional’s 0.61, however that distinction is in the end fairly minimal.

With the 2 additionally utilizing aluminum for the enclosure and being densely packed, they’re additionally in the identical kind of weight ballpark. The MacBook Professional is lightest at 3.5 kilos, however at 3.92 kilos, the Blade 14 is not that far off.

It is not fairly a MacBook Professional, however no less than the Blade 14 is not a stereotypically huge and heavy gaming pocket book.

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: Show

The 2 notebooks are recognized by title as having similarly-sized screens. That is pretty true, however not totally.

For a begin, the MacBook Professional is supplied with a 14.2-inch show, fairly than the 14-inch in its title and its rival. That 0.2 is just about negated by Apple’s use of a notch in the midst of the display, with the unfinished strip on the prime often employed for the macOS menu bar or hidden for full-screen content material.

The Razer Blade has a thicker bezel than the MacBook Pro, but no camera notch.

The Razer Blade has a thicker bezel than the MacBook Professional, however no digital camera notch.

There isn’t a notch within the Blade 14’s show, however there’s a skinny bezel line throughout the highest with sufficient area to squeeze within the webcam.

For the decision, Apple’s pocket book soundly wins with 3,024 by 1,964 pixels, giving it a pixel density of 254ppi.

Razer consists of two show choices for its pocket book, relying on the configuration. One model is a QHD display with a decision of two,560 by 1,440, whereas the opposite’s 1,920 by 1,080.

They’ve pixel densities of 209ppi and 157ppi, far behind Apple’s display.

There is a distinction with regards to refresh charge too. Apple’s Promotion show can carry out at as much as 120Hz, mechanically adjusting to match the content material.

Razer’s QHD display has a refresh charge of 165Hz, whereas the 1080p model can deal with as much as 144Hz. Each additionally profit from FreeSync Premium, giving them the identical adaptive framerate function.

On what the screens can show, Apple has Extensive Shade (P3) assist and True Tone. The Blade 14 covers “As much as 100% DCI-P3,” which just about equals Apple, in addition to every panel being “individually manufacturing unit calibrated.”

Because the MacBook Professional makes use of Mini LED backlighting, meaning it could possibly present extraordinarily good shade illustration and a sky-high brightness of 1,000 nits, 1,600 at peak brightness. Razer would not disclose what its LED-backlit monitor can output, however the consensus is that it could possibly handle over 300 nits.

Apple claims its show can supply a 1,000,000:1 distinction ratio. Razer would not formally say the distinction ratio of its display, but it surely’s actually not going to be as excessive because the MacBook Professional.

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: CPU Efficiency

The 14-inch MacBook Professional is accessible in three processing choices: 8-core M1 Professional, 10-core M1 Professional, and 10-core M1 Max. The 8-core has six efficiency cores and two effectivity cores, with the 10-core variations including one other two.

That is all supported by Unified Reminiscence, Apple’s single-pool reminiscence answer that companies all chip components with one lump of quick storage. It is an environment friendly idea, as there’s much less information duplication.

The Unified Reminiscence operates at 200GB/s for the M1 Professional and 400GB/s for the M1 Max.

It is also aided by the Neural Engine, Apple’s 16-core aspect devoted to machine studying, which will help in an assortment of duties, corresponding to picture manipulation. There are additionally Media Engines, that are particularly made to assist with the encoding and decoding of video for sure codecs.

Razer consists of two processor choices in its roster. Its headline addition is the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, an 8-core, 16-thread chip with a 3.3GHz base clock, a 4.9GHz boosted clock pace, 20MB of Cache, and onboard Radeon 680M graphics.

The alternate possibility is the Ryzen 5900HX, the predecessor to the 6900HX. It has the identical core and thread counts and similar base clock pace however a decrease boosted pace of 4.6GHz.

GeekBench 5 suggests Apple's M1 Pro and Max could beat the Blade 14's Ryzen chips.

GeekBench 5 suggests Apple’s M1 Professional and Max may beat the Blade 14’s Ryzen chips.

GeekBench would not have a processor-specific benchmark for the 6900HX, however submitted scores for notebooks utilizing it level to scores round 1,500 factors for the single-core take a look at and seven,800 for the multi-core model. The 5900HX does have processor-specific scores, with it managing 1,417 and seven,672 in single-core and multi-core assessments, respectively.

For the 14-inch MacBook Professional, the 8-core M1 Professional scores 1,731 within the single-core assessments and 9,509 in multi-core. The ten-core M1 Professional goes to 1,738 for single and 12,004 for multi-core. Lastly, the 10-core M1 Max can get to 1,747 on the only and 12,169 on multi-core.

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: Graphics

Apple’s M1 vary has numerous GPU core counts, which differ based mostly on what chip you go for.

The 8-core M1 Professional solely has a 14-core GPU accessible. The ten-core M1 Professional has the 14-core GPU and a 16-core possibility. The M1 Max begins with a 24-core GPU, with an additional possibility of a 32-core GPU accessible.

The GPU advantages from the identical Unified Reminiscence pool because the CPU and so additionally positive aspects extra reminiscence to work with when a consumer upgrades the RAM.

Razer consists of 5 completely different GPU choices alongside every processor’s built-in graphics.

The bottom alternative is the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop computer GPU with 6GB of GDDR6 VRAM, that includes 3,840 CUDA cores, together with second-gen ray tracing cores and third-gen Tensor cores.

There are two RTX 3070 Laptop computer GPUs in use, each with 8GB of GDDR6. The non-Ti model is supplied with 5,120 CUDA cores, whereas the Ti has 5,888.

Lastly, the GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop computer GPU is on the excessive finish, supplied in each Ti and non-Ti variations. The non-TI version has 6,144 CUDA cores, whereas the TI tops the checklist at 7,424 CUDA cores.

The GeForce RTX GPUs in the Razer Glade 14 are very good, but it's a case of discrete GPUs against Apple's fantastic integrated options.

The GeForce RTX GPUs within the Razer Glade 14 are superb, but it surely’s a case of discrete GPUs in opposition to Apple’s implausible built-in choices.

Utilizing GeekBench’s OpenCL benchmarks, the Nvidia playing cards do properly, with the 3080 scoring 125,425 for non-Ti and 136,008 for the Ti. The 3070 Ti manages 119,528 to the non-Ti’s 111,833, and the 3060 rounds out the group with 92,420.

GeekBench would not differentiate the core counts of the M1 Professional and Max in its outcomes browser, so we do not know if both result’s for a 14- or 16-core GPU or a 24- or 32-core GPU, but it surely says the M1 Professional scores 35,724, and the M1 Max will get to 56,581.

It’s price allowing for that we’re evaluating the M1’s built-in GPU in opposition to a discrete model, however each Ryzen chips have built-in graphics for extra pedestrian workloads.

For the 5900HX, AMD calls it “Radeon graphics” with a lowly core rely of 8 and a frequency of two,100MHz, which is small. The 6900Hx has “Radeon 680M” built-in graphics, with a core rely of 12 and a 2,400MHz frequency.

Neither built-in graphics possibility seems in GeekBench’s OpenCL outcomes by title, making them laborious to match. Nonetheless, the sometimes underwhelming nature of built-in graphics would not play into the Blade 14’s favor, actually.

As a aspect level, each the Razer Blade 14 and the 14-inch MacBook Professional embody energetic cooling, enabling the 2 to work at a excessive stage of efficiency for longer earlier than thermal throttling comes into play.

Within the case of the Blade 14, Razer markets its thermal administration as “Vapor Chamber Liquid Cooling,” combining inside liquid cooling methods together with followers within the base to push heat exhaust air out the again.

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: Digital camera, Audio, Biometrics

The Razer Blade 14 and 14-inch MacBook Professional each have a webcam, although with barely completely different capabilities. Every have a 1080p decision, except for a 720p model in Blades with the 5900HX, however their capabilities differ.

For instance, the FaceTime HD digital camera utilized by the MacBook Professional advantages from picture sign processing options within the M1 chip to enhance the image. On the opposite aspect, the Blade 14 makes use of a Home windows Hi there IR webcam, which can be utilized with the Home windows Hi there biometric safety system.

Talking of biometrics, Apple does embody Contact ID within the MacBook Professional.

The top and base of the Razer Blade 14.

The highest and base of the Razer Blade 14.

On the audio entrance, Apple makes use of a set of six high-fidelity audio system with huge stereo and assist for spatial audio. Razer’s pocket book has stereo audio system however with THX Spatial Audio assist.

For audio recording, Apple has a trio of microphones with directional beamforming. In the meantime, Razer makes use of an “array microphone” for its audio capturing.

Then there’s the headphone jack, which each programs supply.

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: Storage and Reminiscence

Storage and reminiscence considerations are a big departure for the 2 corporations. One offers you way more choices than the opposite, but it surely’s not the one some will count on.

Apple gives 16GB of Unified Reminiscence in its M1 Professional fashions, with upgrades accessible to maneuver it as much as 32GB. For the M1 Max variations, 32GB is the bottom quantity, with upgrades accessible to maneuver to 32GB.

For Razer, there is not an improve accessible, as you are caught with a set 16GB of reminiscence. For fashions utilizing the Ryzen 9 6900HX, this takes the type of DDR5-4000MHz reminiscence, whereas the 5900HX variations use DDR4-3200MHz.

Neither Apple nor Razer give choices to improve the reminiscence after buy. Apple places its reminiscence proper on the SoC, whereas Razer solders it in place.

It is a comparable story on the storage entrance, with Apple providing 512GB on the base stage with choices as much as 8TB accessible. You are once more restricted to only a 1TB NVMe SSD within the Razer Blade 14, no matter configuration.

Nonetheless, not like the reminiscence, the drive within the Blade 14 may be changed and upgraded to a 2TB model after buy. There isn’t a such inside improve possibility for the MacBook Professional, forcing customers into utilizing exterior enlargement choices.

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: Connectivity

The 14-inch MacBook Professional has extra ports than some earlier MacBook Professional generations. The checklist consists of an SDXC card slot, HDMI output, and a trio of USB 4 ports that may deal with Thunderbolt connectivity.

These USB 4 ports can deal with recharging for the MacBook Professional, making it helpful for attaching to a dock or monitor with energy supply capabilities. There’s additionally MagSafe 3 accessible, a devoted charging port that magnetically attaches the cable, protecting all USB ports free for information.

Razer offers a variety of ports on the sides of the Blade 14.

Razer gives quite a lot of ports on the edges of the Blade 14.

Razer’s Blade 14 features a pair of USB Sort-C 3.2 Gen 2 ports, which will also be used for charging and as a DisplayPort. There are additionally two USB Sort-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports, an HDMI 2.1 connection, and an influence port.

On the wi-fi connectivity aspect, the MacBook Professional gives Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0, which is ok however not earth-shattering. Razer goes additional with Qualcomm-based Wi-Fi 6E in addition to Bluetooth 5.3 assist.

Although Razer goes the additional mile on wi-fi, it does rely on having a Wi-Fi 6E-supporting community to do it justice correctly.

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: Energy and Different Particulars

The MacBook Professional has a 70WHr lithium-polymer battery, which Apple says can final for 17 hours of Apple TV app film playback, or as much as 11 hours of wi-fi net entry.

Razer says the Blade 14 comprises a 61.6WHr lithium-ion polymer battery with an 11-hour utilization time. Razer would not say what this era includes, corresponding to what functions are being run, or duties are being carried out, however that is nonetheless a hefty period of time for typical pocket book utilization.

Beneath heavy load, each notebooks will seemingly supply customers shorter battery lives anyway.

To get energy again into the notebooks, every is supplied with a charger.

The MacBook Professional is provided with both a 67W USB-C energy adapter with the 8-core M1 Professional, or a 96W model for different fashions. This can be utilized with each a USB-C connection or MagSafe with the proper cables, so it could possibly recharge when docked to a tool with enough energy supply.

Razer has a 230W energy adapter included with its pocket book.

Each supply backlit keyboards, however whereas Apple’s is white with an ambient gentle sensor, Razer makes use of per-key Chroma RGB backlighting for its N-Key rollover keyboard.

Razer Blade 14 vs 14-inch MacBook Professional: Configuration Pricing

Apple sells the bottom 14-inch MacBook Professional with the 8-core CPU, 14-core GPU, 16GB of reminiscence, and 512GB of storage for $1,999.

Upgrading the SoC to the 10-core CPU, 14-core GPU model of the M1 Professional prices an additional $200, with the 16-core GPU possibility an extra $100. Going to the M1 Max with a 24-core GPU is an extra $200, and the M1 Max with 32-core GPU possibility is $200 above even that.

The 16GB of reminiscence may be upgraded to 32GB for $400 on the M1 Professional fashions. M1 Max begins at 32GB, but it surely’s an additional $400 to 64GB.

Going from 512GB to 1TB is an additional $200, with 2TB an extra $400. 4TB is $600 on prime, and going from 4TB to 8TB is $1,200.

The most costly 14-inch Mac Professional, with the 32-core GPU, M1 Max, 64GB of reminiscence, and 8TB of storage, prices $5,899.

The Razer Blase 14 assortment begins from $1,999.99, with the Full HD display, Ryxen 9 6900Hz, and the GeForce RTX 3060.

The following costly is the primary QHD mannequin, with the 5900HX and RTX 3070, costing $2,199.99.

Lastly, the $3,499.99 premium possibility nets you the QHD display, 6900HX, and the RTX 3080 Ti.

Not fairly similar however equally good

The Razer Blade 14 is a pocket book that tries to supply MacBook Professional styling however in a gamer-centric Home windows PC format. As we now have stated earlier than, when placing the Razer Blade 15 Superior in opposition to the 16-inch MacBook Professional, there is a appreciable quantity of similarity on show.

What’s completely different right here is that you do not get all the benefits that the Blade 15 Superior has. Mainly its use of OLED for the show.

Razer's Blade 14 is as stylish as possible for a gaming notebook.

Razer’s Blade 14 is as fashionable as doable for a gaming pocket book.

The Blade 14’s display makes use of the well-known LCD know-how, full with LED backlighting that may’t compete with the MacBook Professional’s miniLED model. The upper refresh charge and the QHD resolutions shall be greater than sufficient for its audience.

They’re pretty shut by way of physicality, however whereas the MacBook is barely lighter, it isn’t sufficient to be an enormous burden to customers.

Then there’s reminiscence and storage, which Apple in some way manages to dominate in each capability and the breadth of choices accessible to shoppers. There are not any such choices for the Blade 14, with the configuration variations just about being about which processor, GPU, or display decision you need.

That being stated, there’s nonetheless a number of efficiency on present from the Blade 14. The included discrete GPUs are, on paper, greater performing than Apple’s built-in GPU choices, however on the similar time, it is extra prone to be energy hungry as properly.

The Razer Blade 14 is actually what you possibly can contemplate an possibility for individuals who need efficiency on the go. As long as you are high-quality with the reminiscence and storage, the usage of Home windows, and taming a wild RGB-lit keyboard, it is a contender for energy customers.

For content material creators, the GPU efficiency is actually useful for video work within the Blade 14, however so are the Media Engines within the M1 Professional and M1 Max. The Blade 14 might be Home windows-based substitute, if the potential video editor is useless set in opposition to a MacBook Professional for some cause.

For everybody else who desires configuration flexibility and efficiency however not bleeding-edge graphics, the 14-inch MacBook Professional might be greater than sufficient for his or her wants.

The place to purchase



Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.